Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alberta Forest Products Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was '''Keep. Non-admin closure by -- Gordonrox24  &#124; Talk 12:09, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Doesn't meet WP:N Gordonrox24 ''' &#124; Talk 15:56, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 19:11, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 19:11, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - notability can be established via these sources;,, , , ,, , , , ,, . The main problem here is that the article needs a re-write from an experienced editor, all the tags wildly thrown on the page and the fact no one bothered to look for any sources makes this all the more a case of WP:BEFORE. The sources I have shown confirm the organization exists, confirms that it is important to the Canadian economy, shows high level meetings between governmental officials and the organization, illustrates that authors and scholars use the association within their books and finally when added into the article demonstrate WP:N. - Marcusmax ( speak ) 00:28, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Agreed that this should be kept (its notable) and re-written. Fuzbaby (talk) 14:52, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Per sources found by Marcusmax. -- &oelig; &trade; 20:06, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep significant coverage . LibStar (talk) 06:48, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.