Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alberto monnar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Given the continual recreations, restoring salting is also appropriate. Rlendog (talk) 15:55, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Alberto monnar

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A Jazz musician. Refs given in article are all self-published. No reliable sources to be found. Has only self released one album. Fails WP:MUSICBIO. Prod was contested. Bgwhite (talk) 21:34, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Bgwhite (talk) 21:35, 30 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment he has certainly appeared on the highly lol Sábado Gigante 86.44.24.82 (talk) 20:01, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note I have moved the page to be correctly capitalized. It is now located at Alberto Monnar. Ham  tech  person  17:17, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. I've searched widely, including Spanish language sources. Apart from the video wherein he apparently was a "winner" in one Gong Show-like segment of one television show (see here for a description), there is no coverage of him which is not self published. He is not signed to any record company, all cds are self-published. Clearly fails WP:MUSICBIO. This is the third attempt at creating the article. Note, I have renoved the entire section on "Early Childhood", as blatant copyvio from his own blog. The section is still available in the history. Voceditenore (talk) 16:16, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator and voceditenore.4meter4 (talk) 21:19, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Not only is this failing MUSICBIO, it is not the third attempt to create the page, but the 8th under this title and the incorrectly capitalized one above. Delete under MUSICBIO and G4. Ham  tech  person  18:19, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment This looks a good candidate for salting once it's deleted. It has already been salted once, but the protection expired last September. Voceditenore (talk) 18:27, 6 February 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.