Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albion (Marvel Comics)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. T. Canens (talk) 21:08, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Albion (Marvel Comics)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fictional character(s) who fail(s) WP:N. There's simply no significant coverage in third-party reliable sources for either of them. Notability isn't inherited from the comics they appear in. Claritas § 18:08, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  —J Greb (talk) 00:21, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep as already covering multiple characters. Per Albion_(disambiguation), it's clear that there is going to be difficulty sourcing this without hitting false positives, for example adding "pendragon" to the search just gives tons of false positives. Thus, lack of evidence cannot be reasonably interpreted as evidence of lack in this case. Jclemens (talk) 17:18, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Umm, there's a policy called WP:NRVE....if you can't find sources, "it's difficult to find sources" isn't a reason to keep......Claritas § 18:15, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  14:58, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Jclemens' interesting interpretation. :) BOZ (talk) 17:34, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per nom and, interestingly, per JClemens explanation of his keep. As he rightly points out there are no RS asserting notability, and it seems that it is unlikely any can reasonably be found. Therefore by policy it should be a delete, with no prejudice to recreation if sources are found in future. Verbal chat  20:12, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * delete tried to WP:Verify Notability but couldn't find reliable independent sources. Shooterwalker (talk) 22:52, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.