Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albion (Warhammer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 04:45, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Albion (Warhammer)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I'm hereby nominating this article for deletion because IMHO the subject is all but irrelevant for the average reader, failing the mandatory notability requirements. The article describes a fictional archipelago of a fictional continent of a fictional world. The subject is largely unimportant for the setting itself, not being one of the major political factions. I believe that this is a rather simple case of WP:GAMEGUIDE and WP:Fancruft (the second is not an official policy but please read it anyway). My most important reason is the following: The article lacks ANY sources whatsoever (since 2005!). The subject is also mentioned in a proper if somewhat short fashion in the article Races and nations of Warhammer Fantasy and that should be more than enough. Thank you for your attention. Flamarande (talk) 12:04, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 21:05, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 22:45, 23 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:28, 31 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete: No evidence that the subject of the article meets the general notability guideline or that it can be anything other than a plot-only description of a fictional work. Also, Wikipedia is not video game guide to justify this type of content. Jfgslo (talk) 03:45, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as lacking sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:41, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.