Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albion High School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. -- King of Hearts | (talk) 00:24, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Albion High School
This a disambiguation page for two pages that don't exist. Further, it is an orphaned page. I say that it should be deleted, and should the need for a disambiguation page ever arise, it can then be reinstated. -Fermion 10:34, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
 * delete per nom. No need to disambiguate between pages which don't yet exist. Can be recreated if there's a future need. └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 10:42, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per UkPaolo
 * Keep. Disambiguation pages such as this do no harm, with or without red links.  Some new blue-ish links have been added.  Silensor 00:23, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep &mdash; RJH 04:03, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep now with two blue links, although I agree with the original nom. Melchoir 05:06, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I have no problem with disambig pages that contain only red links, as long as all the red links are notable.  They can serve to distinguish between redlinks in external articles, and simplify future architecture. -Colin Kimbrell 16:16, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. There now exist blue links. Red-linked dabs aren't a huge problem, anyway; they simply encourage further expansion. &mdash; Rebelguys2 talk 17:37, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep as nomination no longer applies. Pepsidrinka 20:11, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Wow the need arose pretty quickly. Who knew there were three Albion High Schools? -- JJay 00:39, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep now there are blue links. Also note that there should not be many inbound links to disambiguation pages. Thryduulf 11:42, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Rebelguys2 Gflores Talk 18:53, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, no good reason to delete Inventm 02:36, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Is it possible to go back on my nomination for deletion? Now that there are the two pages that it links to, and a third on the way, I also think it is no longer needed to delete the page.  Thanks, -Fermion 05:38, 9 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.