Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albrecht Folsing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Woohookitty 11:49, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

Albrecht Fölsing
unverifiable: cannot find indication that two books 'cited' by author of biography exist, and his reply was useless; the Einstein biography is genuine but I don't think it makes this Folsing notable CH (talk) 15:28, 1 October 2005 (UTC)


 * OK, since I nominated the article various editors have replaced the questionable books which books which I do not doubt are genuine, and at least one I already verified myself, so, er :-/ I am changing my vote to keep.---CH (talk) 15:34, 2 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep and expand (Amazon did help). Google has more that 1300 hits on Folsing, in several languages. Delete all the nonsense but don't throw out the baby at the same time. Ejrrjs | What? 16:57, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * It appears that this real author, who has written several biographies, was used to make the articles about "Dimitrius Josef Stachnikov" and his purported theory seem plausible, by stating that he had written a biography of Stachnikov as well. Unlike Stachnikov, this person's existence is verifiable.  He furthermore satisfies the Criteria for inclusion of biographies, having written books published by Penguin and others. Keep. Uncle G 18:06, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Has published several easily verifiable books, and the Einstein biography has been translated into at least three languages (English, Finnish and Swedish). Uppland 18:19, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep this notable author. Karol 11:06, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 'keep', as above. --Isolani 12:44, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.