Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Album One


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 05:19, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Album One

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NALBUM. The band is barely notable. Domdeparis (talk) 09:50, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  12:17, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Oppose: The band's notability is not in question. The article for this album is in need of more citations, but I oppose its outright deletion. – Matthew  - (talk) 22:32, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I am afraid the notability of the band is in question. I added a notability tag that you removed but the sources added are not enough to pass WP:GNG they are at best passing mentions. I will be adding it again and if nothing more is added the band's article will also go to AFD. There is nothing to suggest that this album will pass GNG without more sources. It was self released and does not have multiple reviews and did not chart amongst other criteria that it doesn't meet. Domdeparis (talk) 08:02, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I meant the band's notability is irrelevant in this discussion. If the band is notable, it would not impact the notability of the article tagged for deletion. That being said, the band's article is heavily flawed, and I will look towards doing major cleanup on it in the coming days. Most of that article's sources are primary or from things like Blogspot, and that ain't gonna do. Cheers. – Matthew  - (talk) 09:44, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * One of the criteria for CSD is A9. Had the band and band members pages been deleted beforehand then this page could have been speedy deleted. That was what I meant. In general a recording that is from a non notable artist gets deleted without discussion. Domdeparis (talk) 10:20, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947(c) (m) 20:32, 5 October 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kagundu  Talk To Me  12:28, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - The notability of the band that recorded this album is irrelevant to this discussion? Alrighty then. The album still fails WP:NALBUM and is well below our general notability guideline. Sources, both in the article and a search, are either unreliable or from the band's own website.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 23:04, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not meet WP:NALBUM & significant RS coverage not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:55, 20 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.