Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albums that Planet Sound have rated 9/10


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 04:30, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Albums that Planet Sound have rated 9/10

 * – (View AfD) (View log)
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Arbitrary intersection, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate pile of information. Unsourced, suspected original research. Plus I would be pretty hard-pressed to find someone who cares. MER-C 06:36, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete worse, it's copyvio. Judging from those lists, this Planet Sound entity seems like it has great taste in music, and should therefore be allowed to keep its traffic. Fee Fi Foe Fum 08:45, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. It's patently obvious that this is completely indiscriminate information that does not belong in a project to build a high-quality encyclopedia.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 10:59, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. Where to start? Why a list of ratings? Why from a Teletext review service? Why 9/10 ratings? The definition of arbitrary, nuke them both.  tomasz.  15:36, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * This deletion is rated 10/10 per all of the above. Clarityfiend 18:36, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'm the original author.First of all, there's no issue of copyright violation since if you read the discussion page of the Planet Sound article, the actual editor of it expresses his wish for the lists to remain. Secondly, the articles are meant to be companions to the main Planet Sound article in the same way as a discography is for a music artist. They've been separated from the main article in response to a cleanup tag that had been on the Planet Sound article page since the summer (in addition to other changes that have been made to the page).Lastly, all of the other points that have been raised can be answered by reading the Planet Sound and Teletext articles. Marv Karkian 18:52, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete both - Wikipedia articles are not internal linkfarms nor are they music review directories, there is no reason to give weight to this review service over any other, there is no reason to believe that being rated 9/10 on this site has any significance, articles for 9/10 ratings and not other ratings is completely arbitrary (and we shouldn't have 20 more articles for the rest of the 0-10 rated material). These are not comparable to a discography for an artist. The precedent that letting these stand would establish for similar articles for every review service somebody felt like typing up is unacceptable. Otto4711 19:52, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as a copyvio of Planet Sound's intellectual property. Corvus cornix 23:00, 28 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.