Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alcatraz (horse)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Alcatraz (horse)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

No content apart from an infobox full of redlinks. I have been unable to find any reliable sources for this horse. Certainly no in-depth coverage, so fails WP:GNG  Tigerboy1966   12:28, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:04, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:04, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ecuador-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:04, 20 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete non notable racehorse which hasn't won anything significant Seasider91 (talk) 17:08, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete This stub's creator's edits in 2008 were all only on this racehorse and a single crown and then he left wikipedia. This hardly gives any notability on this horse which has not won any major prizes bar one. This is not the Kentucky Derby. --Artene50 (talk) 00:23, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment The Triple Crown he won isn't referenced either. It was when I was trying to add references to the Triple Crown of Thoroughbred Racing article, when I stumbled upon this one.  Tigerboy1966  08:06, 21 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Having looked at Tigerboy's link it appears that whilst this is a top horse in Ecuador not all triple crown winners deserve an article on Wikipedia as not all countries have the same standard of racing as the UK or USSeasider91 (talk) 12:59, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - if sources could be found this would be an automatic keep, but an article that is an infobox and no text is not an article (and there really, really should be a speedy criterion for that). - The Bushranger One ping only 21:48, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.