Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alcibiades Jones


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Carbonite | Talk 12:17, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

Alcibiades Jones
This page was reporrted as a copyvio, howver the author owns the copyright. The article is a puff piece for a band that does not meet WP:MUSIC, delete. --nixie 03:13, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The first line says it all "Alcibiades Jones is a band that likes to take off." In other words it hasn't taken off yet and is no different from millions of other bands. The article continues with irreperable POV promotional language and ends in extensive linking. Delete as band promotion advert. - Mgm|(talk) 08:22, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - it's textbook band vanity. Scimitar parley 18:05, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep and cleanup. I'm not sure they don't meet WP:MUSIC standards. The article is cruft, sure - it can be cleaned up though (and those dreadful downloads removed!) The band itself may well be (barely) N. Their one cd has a review by Keith 'MuzikMan' Hannaleck at [Evolving Artist] which is repeated on at least 6 other sites, verbatim - not good, that - but the key word is guidelines on wp:music, yes? and they have a strong review on [Kweevak] also. As in, not quite Noteable by wp:music but almost... and as they're planning another cd and not breaking up, perhaps would be best to clean the article so its not advert? KillerChihuahua 18:07, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:MUSIC. Wouldn't be surprised to find that it's a copyvio from somewhere. --Carnildo 20:58, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:MUSIC guidelines. Mallocks 21:59, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete; does not meet WP:MUSIC to my mind, nor have any overriding notability not reflected in those tests. MCB 23:25, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.