Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alcohol and Teenage Brains


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. bainer (talk) 09:44, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

Alcohol and Teenage Brains
This article was previously speedied due to copyvio. I speedied it again, but the author has come forward to resolve the copyvio issue (see talk page). I'd still classify it as original research. Jasmol 04:13, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Original research. The subject is of course serious: but the category belongs in Ficciones. Billbrock 04:34, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 *  Keep . I think deleteing this article would be stretching the meaning of the original research policy.  The article lists numerous references and there has been no indication, either here or on the talk page, that they are incorrect or do not deal with the subject of the article.  Movementarian 06:16, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I am withdrawing my vote and am declaring myself Neutral. I still think that this stretched the original research rule, but this article displays a large amount of POV bias including the title.  Movementarian 03:51, 17 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Agree with Movementarian, but express reservations about accuracy nontheless. Neutral. -- Миборовский U 07:24, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Not an article for an encyclopaedia. Delete Proto t c 11:00, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Unencyclopedic, doesn't draw any conclusions, just presents the reader with questions squell 12:09, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - I disagree with Movementarian: this may be well-sourced original research, but it's still original research. The conclusions are the author's own. - squibix 14:20, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete original research. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 15:26, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Any worthwhile information should be added in Alcohol :: Supergolden 15:32, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Neutral. Agree that the information should be added to Alchohol entry. This viewpoint on alchohol usage is definately out there and can be addressed in an encyclopedic fashion but this particular work definately needs to be edited to meet NPOV standards. Epolk 18:48, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I agree. This has some content of merit, but the approach and the title are wrong.  A merge of the encyclopaedic content is undoubtedly justified. - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 18:56, 16 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep - has references, not original research, and is a valid article of merit. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy  Darwikinian Eventualist 14:23, 21 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.