Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ale Resnik (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Enigmamsg 02:57, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Ale Resnik
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable, and presumably originally intended as promotional. At this point, the article seems to be about how he failed to raise money for his entrepreneurial activities. Created by a paid editor in the period before hislatest company failed.  DGG ( talk ) 02:08, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 05:56, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 05:56, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 05:56, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 05:56, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 05:56, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 05:56, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:46, 6 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete a non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:39, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment: First, this article already was reviewed at WP: AfC when it was created, as I had a WP:COI. The independent reviewer found it notable to begin with, when it had less sourcing. . Next, under WP: Notability (people), the success or failure of the article subject in their business endeavors isn't a policy factor, so far as I can see. Indeed, "notability is not temporary"; if he was notable during Beepi's existence, he's still notable. WP:NTEMP. The notability policy also says if depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability, although trivial coverage of a subject by secondary source doesn't count. Here we have both some in-depth and some non-trivial coverage of Resnik in several reliable sources, such as MIT Technology Review (Spanish) Univision, LaNacion, MIT Technology Review, PulsoSocial, Wired, Business Insider, New York Times. Since he was raised in Argentina, some of the more in-depth coverage here is in from tier-one sources in Spanish (e.g. Univision, La Nacion, MIT Technology Review (Spanish)), which can be read via Google Translate by non-Spanish speakers. - BC1278 (talk) 18:55, 6 July 2018 (UTC)BC1278
 * Just as article that has been deleted through the AfD process can be recreated and stay up for good on the basis of a new consensus (or benign neglect), so an article that was assessed as worthy to stay up by an editor can be brought down through the AfD process. Two-way. -The Gnome (talk) 08:50, 12 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete: does not meet WP:ANYBIO; significant RS coverage not found. Sourcing is in passing, WP:SPIP and / or not independent of the subject's company. Being named "Top Innovator Under 35" etc. is an insufficient claim of significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:28, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
 * There is a long article about the subject in MIT Tech Review, accompanying his being on that "35" list. The article is what counts toward notability, not the list. I ask that that you please don't discount sources just because they are in Spanish. There are several other extended profiles of the subject in tier-one Spanish-language press. Univision, LaNacion, PulsoSocial. That is four in-depth profiles of the subject from tier-one sources. The other references I mention in this discussion, in the comment immediately above, are not in "passing" -- they talk about his personal background in some way. Wired, Business Insider, New York Times Each one need not not have the depth to confer notability by itself under WP: Notability (people). Multiple sources can be combined.BC1278 (talk) 15:30, 9 July 2018 (UTC)BC1278.


 * Delete as per nom. The sum total of his career section is a failed company. The awards section is very odd when you search for "Global Young Jewish Leader" the only hits are to sources that quote the subject. One would expect an award supposedly given by the state of Israel as is claimed in the article to have some reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Fails ANYBIO. Dom from Paris (talk) 16:27, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Does not WP:ANYBIO. Does WP:PROMO. -The Gnome (talk) 22:12, 11 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.