Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleem-Ud-Din Khan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 01:33, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Aleem-Ud-Din Khan

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article was PRODed by User:I dream of horses on 19 June with the comment, "Biographical stub article about politician and business doesn't state WHY he should be in an encyclopedia--doesn't seem to have won an election, award, etc." PROD was contested by User:71.126.137.177 on 25 June with the comment, "Removed prod due to actual evidence for notability in "political career" section". As I understand that section, however, Khan stood for election twice but was not elected either time. I can find no mention of this name in news archives. Subject seems to fail WP:N. Cnilep (talk) 22:48, 16 July 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:44, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  —Cnilep (talk) 22:58, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  —Cnilep (talk) 22:58, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  —Cnilep (talk) 22:58, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * As the original nominator for deletion, delete per my previous statement. --I dream of horses (T) @ 01:06, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. Just fails WP:N. Little if any notability. Google returns at the most <40,000 results, depending on the spelling used. Tim Song (talk) 13:07, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - jurists are not per se notable, and this one does not seem notable; no relevant citations. Bearian (talk) 18:15, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.