Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleen N. Johnson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 18:19, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Aleen N. Johnson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article appears to be unfit for Wikipedia from the standpoints of both WP:N and WP:TABLOID. Within the article itself, there are four citations from three websites, all of which are either tabloids or tabloid-adjacent. I do not believe that her social media use, activism, tattoo collection, modelling, proclivity for (vegan) pizza, or her general eccentricity merit inclusion on Wikipedia due to a lack of credible coverage outside of tabloid fodder, and therefore a lack of notability.

Furthermore, the account who created the Aleen N. Johnson page,, has not made any edits to Wikipedia outside of direct association with the Aleen N. Johnson page. The fact that a single-purpose account is behind the article harms the article's viability here.

Her relationship with Playboy could carry notability, but is so far the only implication of such. If Johnson must be proven as Wiki-notable, there needs to be a heavy expansion to her article that includes plenty of cited information from non-tabloid, non-social media sources. Otherwise, toss it. Mungo Kitsch (talk) 02:09, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 02:12, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 02:12, 23 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete the tabloid nature of the sources disqualifies the article. It is also so far past time we make it so single purpose accounts cannot create new articles this is just unacceptable. Creating new articles should not be the first edit anyone does. We really need to start making every article go through the articles for creation process. It is way past time we stopped making it significantly easier to create articles than to delete them.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:51, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Good idea overall. I like that, for example, IPs cannot make articles anymore. I do believe, however, that the Articles for Creation process should be made optional for experienced editors who have proven through competence and a history of positive contribution to Wikipedia that they are here to build an encyclopedia. I believe the qualifications can be similar to editing semi-protected pages (only upon autoconfirmation, when four days and ten edits have transpired); the qualifications could possibly even be taller than that. Mungo Kitsch (talk) 05:00, 24 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete The playboy magazine might have been notable attention, but the content is just interviews - it seems all of the sources I can find on her are tabloids and/or non-indpendent/non-secondary interviews, so she doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG. She has international coverage too, so it's possible some of those sources could be reliable, but I doubt it from all of the English sources I've seen. - Whisperjanes (talk) 01:13, 25 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.