Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alefox (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Singu larity  06:32, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Alefox
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not notable. Few if anyone uses the software, it hasn't been updated in two years, and it's just a theme. I don't think it's even notable enough to include in the small Alex Albrecht article.--Theymos (talk) 12:35, 27 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete for reasons outline by the nominator. This fails WP:SOFTWARE as well.   coccyx bloccyx  (toccyx)  17:47, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  19:24, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete G4 -- Mark Chovain 06:15, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. &lt;sarcasm&gt;So this is what the Microsoft shills were trying to warn about when they FUDded about forking of the Mozilla code base, back in 1998.&lt;/sarcasm&gt; Looks like unmaintained joke software that quite likely didn't get that much publicity to begin with. Would consider merge material to Diggnation/Alex Albrecht if this had been a bit more widely publicised. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 16:33, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. If there was even a passing mention somewhere perhaps it could be bundled with the Albrecht page, but I'm just not seeing it. RFerreira (talk) 17:59, 30 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.