Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alejandro Gámez


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman 18:25, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Alejandro Gámez

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Only assertions of notability are some prizes whose relative importance are not apparent. &mdash; Coren (talk) 01:58, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions.   --  TravellingCari  02:01, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   --  TravellingCari  02:01, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
 * No comprende Need a Spanish-literate editor to evaluate the 192 Google News and 11 Google books hits. Skomorokh  12:44, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. The whole point of this process is to give editors a chance to make a case. Best way to make a case is to satisfy objections by modifying the article to withstand criticism. As the article stands, no case has been made (my opinion which can be outweighed by others). As it is, this is a vague article with little support for a nice guy who is not particularly notable. Cite third party sources (preferably in English, but not necessarily so - just strengthens the case for an English language wikipedia entry) that indicate the subject stands out more than being a mildly accomplished academic. P.S. There is some indication of self-promotion (not a sin, but not encyclopedic in this case) specifically I quote, 1) "He has given advise to enterprises and political parties" and "Tres Sesenta Comunicación Integral is currently planning to expand to other cities of México." Feel free to chime in fellow editors. --Quartermaster (talk) 17:02, 31 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.