Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alejandro Puga (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:18, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Alejandro Puga
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

I find no available matches in GNews and only rare tangential matches in GBooks. The article has been flagged as unsourced since June 2009 but in practice has many years of unsourced-ness and there is no reason to expect improvement with reliable sources to demonstrate significant impact against the criteria of WP:AUTHOR in the near future. Fæ (talk) 15:21, 4 February 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions.  -- Fæ (talk) 15:22, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions.  -- Fæ (talk) 15:23, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:11, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:12, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete Not enough there to show notability...Modernist (talk) 13:48, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject of this unsourced BLP. J04n(talk page) 23:40, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.