Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alek Lexa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 07:40, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Alek Lexa

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested speedy; I still maintain that there is no credible claim to importance or significance here so it should in fact be speediable (but I'm not about to start a revert war over it). I can find exactly zero independent sources, and the person's own website doesn't support any of the claims in the article. Also note that there's been a fairly high level of vandalism by what looks like a small drawer of socks. bonadea contributions talk 19:03, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. No coverage att all to meet WP:BASIC. Plus, the dubious claims in the article are not substantiated by sources. No longer a penguin (talk) 19:17, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. While keeping in mind WP:SUSC regarding vandalism, I agree with the rest of the rationale presented. Looking through WP:ATD, without an article for the actual company there's nothing to merge/redirect to, draft would probably not solve the notability issues unless this person actually starts getting significant coverage. Appable (talk) 19:30, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I forgot to mention that (so thank you for reminding me! :-) ) : an article about the company has been speedily deleted, see deletion log for MYBUS Technology. That the article is vandalised a lot is of course not a reason to delete it, but it is relevant to mention the fact so that the participants in this discussion are aware of it. --bonadea contributions talk 19:54, 22 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Concur with nom and the above. Clearly a self-promotion. Couldn't find any news coverage or secondary sources to meet WP:GNG. On a side note, I did find the Facebook page of the subject's apparent company, and 6 likes hardly seems to suggest any notability. GabeIglesia (talk) 20:45, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Blythwood (talk) 23:08, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above arguments, this is highly dubious. GABHello! 21:04, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:02, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 26 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as per above - Fails GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 03:30, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete with fire This is a 16-year-old child (or maybe 15) who per his website is running for class president at "Haverford", with goals of installing a vending machine to pay for upgrades to the community room. As best I good do, I could not get any context as to what exactly Haverford is, but I think it is either a British educational instituion, or one using the British system. Even people elected presidents of their high school class are not notable, those running for such an office are way below even not notable. This article should have been speedy deleted, it has absolutely no place in Wikipedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:31, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as clearly not even close for any minimal improvements, not acceptable at all. SwisterTwister   talk  04:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.