Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleksandar Bačko


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No policy-based rationale offered for keeping. czar 15:48, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Aleksandar Bačko

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I have been unable to verify notability via significant coverage in independent reliable sources. -- Tavix ( talk ) 13:27, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. -- Tavix  ( talk ) 13:27, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 14:42, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 14:42, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:05, 12 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep--I think you ought to go and notify more of the contributors. As of right now, you only notified one, but there are more in the edit history. I removed the PROD because there were three ethnographic articles published in Serbian by A Bačko that show up on Google Scholar.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 18:40, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
 * If you would like to notify more people, you may do so as long as you follow WP:APPNOTE. Could you please explain how having "three ethnographic articles published in Serbian" confers notability? Simply having something published isn't a criteria for notability—even for academics per WP:NACADEMIC. If you can show that those articles had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources, then there might be something to that. -- Tavix ( talk ) 19:01, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
 * You should notify them, you nominated the article for deletion. They might know Serbian. That he has published in Serbian, but possibly not in English suggests that the notability-demonstrating-evidence could also be in Serbian.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 00:35, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
 * You're the one that is concerned about notifications—I am not. I have considered that this evidence may be in Serbian and that I may have have overlooked it, which is why I have notified WP:DSSERBIA about my action. The WP:BURDEN to provide these sources, however, is on the author(s) of the article, and this should have taken place when the article was written. I have noticed that it still has not happened in the intervening decade, which is concerning to me. -- Tavix ( talk ) 13:40, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are interested in having an impartial discussion on the notability of this person, it would be wise to notify the other contributors. I would be surprised if none of them could read Serbian. The evidence of his notability, if it exists, is likely to be in Serbian.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 15:47, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete having three articles published is not a sign of notability, it is a sign the person is an academic. Not all academics are notable and nothing suggests that Backo is.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:38, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Analog Horror, ( Speak ) 04:45, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. I’ve searched for reliable independent sources and not found any. Mccapra (talk) 04:43, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, xinbenlv  Talk, Remember to "ping" me 05:37, 21 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.