Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleksandra Przegalińska


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nom withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Kj cheetham (talk) 22:34, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Aleksandra Przegalińska

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Doesn't seem to meet WP:NPROF, maybe WP:TOOSOON. Is an associate prof, PhD in 2014, some recent books. Kj cheetham (talk) 16:35, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 16:36, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 16:36, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:49, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep She obviously easily meets WP:NPROF, as a tenured professor. She is a vice rector of a well recognized school, and had publications with top academic presses. Imho, a snowball close. Nobody would propose a deletion of a person of the same status from a US based school. Pundit | utter  17:27, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Commented Tenured professor is not sufficient for that alone to show notability. For WP:NPROF C5 would need to be a named chair or equivalent, and a minimum of a full professor, not an associate. Vice-rector is not the highest administrative post level at the university, so wouldn't meet C6. Having publictions in top academic presses is not sufficient to meet C1, need to show impact from citations/reviews/etc. I thought the citation counts on https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=gkCrlTkAAAAJ were quite low, but I'm happy to be corrected by others for that specific field. Maybe could show impact if there are some reliable reviews of her books? I found https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1440783321999467 but one isn't enough. WP:OTHERSTUFF exists. -Kj cheetham (talk) 18:28, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
 * A quick Google search brings easily another one. She is also widely covered in different media, a frequent TV invited guest, etc. Pundit | utter  18:37, 13 November 2021 (UTC)


 * keep - very very clear GNG pass, based on a Google News search. --Tagishsimon (talk) 22:14, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Withdraw Although I don't think passes WP:NPROF, does pass WP:GNG. -Kj cheetham (talk) 22:28, 13 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.