Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleksandra Troitskaya


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Given the difficulties of finding sources for this type of subject (as described in the discussion), participants appear willing to accept the sources that were found as indicative of notability. RL0919 (talk) 00:01, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Aleksandra Troitskaya

 * – ( View AfD View log

Russian microbiologist-leprologist. Are the criteria for WP: NACADEMIC fulfilled?--Владимир Бежкрабчжян (talk) 08:56, 23 December 2021 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   12:18, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:07, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:07, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:07, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment I see nothing in GScholar or JSTOR using the English name, might find some in the Russian language, tells me she's not notable though. Oaktree b (talk) 16:17, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:52, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Don't delete until someone fluent in Russian and with suitable expertise has looked for sources. A Russian scientist who died in 1979 would have spent their early working-career in a time when the East was an unknown world, the second half in a time when the East and West were separated by the iron curtain, with almost no flow of technical information, and both halves at a time before the internet and the universality of English. Any useful source about this person is bound to be in Russian and historical (and probably quite difficult for non-experts to find), but that doesn't mean they weren't notable. Elemimele (talk) 16:22, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
 * There are more details on her work here, but it will take more digging to find the sources mentioned in the article, and I am uncertain as to the origin of the webpage DaffodilOcean (talk) 04:15, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep, as, , significant coverage excited. Her notability proved. Alimovvarsu (talk) 08:51, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment, having a look at the references in the article and from above editors using good old (or not:)) gtranslate, a couple of the links dont work, this source does not appear reliable (although the infomation may be correct), being submitted to an "anyone can contribute" site by someone called "Farmer", but the remaining sources look okay so i am leaning towards a keep. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:20, 14 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.