Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleksei Bitskoff


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:49, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Aleksei Bitskoff

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Excellent illustrator, but references are job profiles and examples of work. Fails WP:SIGCOV.  scope_creep Talk  13:55, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, uncontroversially fails WP:GNG. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:03, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Estonia,  and United Kingdom.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:11, 4 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Comment I considered this as significant coverage. But it's possible the subject doesn't meet GNG. Dege31 (talk) 21:22, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
 * It is primary and an interview.   scope_creep Talk  23:31, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I would categorize it as a profile rather than an interview, but I'm not seeing anything better, so Delete. Curiocurio (talk) 00:48, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:17, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment I removed the unsourced CV laundry list off the main space, added authority control, and de-orphaned. I think illustrating the 2021 Bloosbury editions of 4 Wayside School books is notable. As is/are(?) his illustrations of the Little Badman series. Unfortunately I am not finding RS for these accomplishments. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:47, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't think a secondary source is needed to verify that. Dege31 (talk) 11:52, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. ExRat (talk) 12:20, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete since subject fails the criteria WP:GNG & WP:CREATIVE for independent notability. Here's hoping this proves to be a case of jumping the gun. -The Gnome (talk) 18:43, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 * delete. Per the nom, there are no reliable secondary sources here and so fails WP:GNG PaulPachad (talk) 01:31, 17 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.