Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alemba


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 23:34, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Alemba

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non notable organization that fails to satisfy WP:NCORP as they lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. A before search links me to press releases and user generated sources which aren’t considered reliable. Celestina007 (talk) 17:12, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:12, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:12, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:12, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:12, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:12, 4 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi Celestina - this article was posted today and we intend to flesh it out with notable and reliable links. In addition, there are clear links to Infra Corporation, EMC and VMware all of whom have extant Wiki articles. The story of this software is interesting but incomplete without the Alemba chapter. Many thanks.
 * Comment — @, hello, although you have declared the conflict of interest it does not translate to auto acceptance for your article into mainspace for being honest, I did however find your comment above strange, you used the plural “we” as opposed to the singular “I” it might interest you to know that an editor is not supposed to share their account with anyone so if multiple people are editing via this account you may want to put an end to that now. Furthermore you seem not to understand NCORP works. Organization need to satisfy WP:NCORP for they to be retained on mainspace. We need reliable sources and unfortunately the organization doesn’t seem to be mainspace worthy. Celestina007 (talk) 19:15, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment — @, (1) Conflict of interest-> autoacceptance. Agreed. (2) Only me using this account. Others will come in using their own accounts. Believe one change has been added already by Martin to add an award given by a company already on Wikipedia. (3) We will continue working to add more content to satisfy the "worthiness" test. Thanks for your guidance.


 * Delete. I'm afraid that none of the 6 sources are valid for WP:N. [1] is a press release and it doesn't mention the subject. [2] confirms a commercial relationship between company A and company B, but it doesn't mean that company B is notable. [3] is a sponsored publication. The "about" section mentions that the customers are charged for such publications. [4] belongs to the company domain. [5] and [6] have the same problems as [3] and [2] respectively. Dr.KBAHT (talk) 22:38, 11 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.