Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleratec


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 20:54, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Aleratec

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:CORP and hopelessly promotional. SmartSE (talk) 14:53, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - all the coverage I'm seeing is press release after press release... there are a couple article and review but just not enough articles about the company itself. —Мандичка YO 😜 15:37, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment:- I found The Journal, The Free Library, This Review in addition to the ones already present in the article. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 18:33, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Question Are any of those reliable sources? Even the WP disambiguation page The Journal doesn't list anything that sounds like that source. The source listed as The Free Library looks like a press release and was published in CD Computing News, which seems like an insignificant computing publication. Newtechreview.com seems to be one guy reviewing some products on a website without editorial control. EricEnfermero (Talk) 22:41, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 08:11, 25 May 2015 (UTC) *Keep for now, the sources above aren't great, but they're something. SilverSurfingSerpent (talk) 16:50, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Struck as by blocked sockpuppet. Davewild (talk) 18:32, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 18:32, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:CORP, tons of press releases (I count hundreds), but no actual reliable source coverage. Esquivalience t 00:25, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unfortunately, my searches show a plethora of press releases especially here with other searches here, here and here found nothing significant. SwisterTwister   talk  06:03, 4 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.