Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alessia Pannese


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 00:17, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Alessia Pannese

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of meeting WP:PROF. No significant publications  DGG ( talk ) 23:17, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:35, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:35, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:36, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:36, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:40, 17 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment The claim that she is an art historian is puzzling. She appears to have a MSt in Literature and Arts from Oxford, but not a degree in art history. Vexations (talk) 01:45, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The claim comes from here. I too was a bit puzzled by the whole thing because every other site mentions that she have degrees in veterinary medicine, not art. Yet, Oxford clearly states that she is a part of History of Art Department. Not my claim. :)--Biografer (talk) 01:54, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
 * As you are the creator of the article, are you able to tell us what notability guidelines you believe she meets? RebeccaGreen (talk) 04:15, 17 May 2019 (UTC)


 * She meets WP:PROF #3, that is, "being a fellow of a major scholarly society which reserves fellow status". In this case, it was EURIAS. Is this organization notable?--Biografer (talk) 04:35, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't think that having a junior fellowship, in this case from the Network of European Institutes for Advanced Study, is the same thing as being elected a fellow of a scholarly society. The fellowship is not permanent - their page says "Within the whole network, more than 500 researchers are hosted every year for up to one full academic year." That is very different from being "a fellow of a major scholarly society which reserves fellow status as a highly selective honor" - the Network is not a major scholarly society, and the fellowship is for one year only, not a status which is conferred on a person for the rest of their life. The EURIAS fellowship (as the other fellowships she has held) are a kind of short-term academic position. RebeccaGreen (talk) 04:48, 17 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. Doesn't meet PROF and doesn't make sense as written. SarahSV (talk) 02:43, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Very early career academic with a GS h-index of at most six. Not yet enough to pass WP:Prof: WP:Too soon. Try again in ten years time. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:59, 17 May 2019 (UTC).
 * Delete I don't find any evidence that she meets either WP:GNG or any WP:NPROF criteria. I don't think the claim that she is an art historian is accurate either - her main interest seems to be in neuroscience, and she has also studied the depiction of anaesthetics in art, the aesthetics of sound perception, etc. WP:TOOSOON. RebeccaGreen (talk) 04:15, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of passing WP:PROF. --Tataral (talk) 07:29, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete TOOSOON. A fellowship ranks with being a lecturer, not with a Professor.  The references are merely to university staff bios.  I also do not see evidence of her being an art historian.  Peterkingiron (talk) 15:49, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per Rebecca Green.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:29, 20 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.