Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Barnett


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per WP:CRIN. --Selket Talk 16:05, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Alex Barnett
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Personal Page. Problems with notability. Please provide reasons to why this person is relevant and needs to be included in wikipedia. -- Throwaway2011 (talk) 23:05, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * (Fixed nom. Please close seven days after 06:16, 17 March 2011 (UTC) -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 06:16, 17 March 2011 (UTC))


 * Delete, the only sources are statistical references, which means there's nothing to support an actual article. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 07:04, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 18 March 2011 (UTC)


 * KEEP Is 50 first class matches not enough? Go and read WP:CRIN.  The-Pope (talk) 04:00, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:ATHLETE and WP:CRIN. Johnlp (talk) 07:58, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Seriously? Keep per WP:ATHLETE and WP:CRIN. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew nixon (talk • contribs) 8:06, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - comfortably meets notability requirements of WP:ATHLETE and WP:CRIN. JH (talk page) 09:49, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - Really? WP:CRIN and the fact he has played 68 professional matches makes him notable.  I'll add WP:ATH for good measure as well. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 22:43, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep – per all above: he has played 50 matches at the highest domestic professional level of his sport.  Harrias  talk 12:17, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.