Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Chamwada


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  21:39, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Alex Chamwada

 * – ( View AfD View log )

the references in the article doesn't seem enough to pass a stand alone article beside the fact that the draft of this article was previously deleted under discussion check Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Alex Chamwada  Dtt1 Talk  07:19, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   Dtt1 Talk  07:19, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions.   Dtt1 Talk  07:19, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kenya-related deletion discussions.   Dtt1 Talk  07:19, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 00:45, 8 December 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 15:57, 16 December 2020 (UTC) Keep This individual seems notable enough to warrant the creation of a Wikipedia page. Maybe needs some WP:PROMO trimmed out but the sources seem to be significant. HarrietsCharriot (talk) 14:46, 22 December 2020 (UTC) — HarrietsCharriot (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: "It is famous" and "seems notable" - anyone else able to weigh in?
 * keep It is famous.-- Pmand Face-smile.svg  •   12:00, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 16:05, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Draftify, subject is likely notable, but the current article is promotional and the primary editor appears to be engaged in UPE. signed,Rosguill talk 22:56, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment sock votes struck. Blablubbs | talk 00:24, 26 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Blatantly promotional. Deb (talk) 14:37, 26 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.