Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Hevia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 11:41, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Alex Hevia
I don't think "first level 60 on WOW" is enough to pass WP:BIO. I also only get a modest 48 Google hits for the name. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 18:38, 30 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete - It may be notable, but probably not citable. Even if it was, there will never be enough for this article to be more than a stub.  Chris Kreider 18:41, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - I don't think that is notable enough. --Nehwyn 18:44, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Sadly, I bet there are more people who care about the first person to reach level 60 in WoW than there are people who care about the first pope. That being said, I see no reason for the wikipedia community to bend to the will of the masses, and fully support a delete.  Also, note that the article's creator and only editor removed a prod tag without comment and doesn't seem to be fully invested in the project that is wikipedia. - b o b b y  18:52, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't seem to be notable. Hello32020 20:11, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, I share the lament of Rob, but alas, that is the culture we live in. Back on topic, first to reach level 60 in WoW is certainly not notable.  I'd be willing to be it was written by this person.  I also advise watching out for articles about the first person to reach lvl 70 in WoW, as with the new expansion this will be possible.  Other things like that, such as first person to reach Outlands, first person to create a Draenei or a Blood Elf, first level 60 or 70 Draenei or Blood Elf, etc., etc.   Dooms  Day  349     Happy Halloween!  21:50, 30 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - Doesn't seem to be verifiable to me. Wickethewok 14:14, 31 October 2006 (UTC)


 * This article is fake* - The day before this article was created, the author deleted the entire page for Nerd and replaced it with, I quote, Alex Hevia. Check the history.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.