Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Labotkin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Singu larity  03:23, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Alex Labotkin

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable. Looks like vanity. Creator removed prod ccwaters (talk) 02:36, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:NN, WP:BIO.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 02:45, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete apparent vanity page, per WP:NOTE. Frank  |  talk  03:22, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacks WP:N and has major WWP:V issues. The unreferenced nature of the article suggests this person is not notable. Artene50 (talk) 07:02, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:BIO. MrPrada (talk) 08:26, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Google search turns up personal blog only. I am not convinced that WP:BIO is met Fraudy (talk) 20:50, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  20:52, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable Alex Bakharev (talk) 01:02, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep if you would like. Really interesting to find myself in wiki :) anyway I can't say that I am not notable just according to Google, that humiliates me. This is simply uncomplited article. And if you think that it should be deleted, it's ok - Alex Labotkin 23:15, 26 May 2008 (GMT+2)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Labotkin (talk • contribs)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.