Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Maine (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedily deleted A7, salted, non-admin close. ukexpat (talk) 22:14, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Alex Maine
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Doesn't appear notable to me. Trivial coverage in local paper. Speedy deleted before but recreated. Leivick (talk) 04:31, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete as lacking verifiability, as well as notability. Needs more than one local newspaper as a source; cursory Google news search turned up nothing. Not opposed to changing my opinion if more than one third-party reliable source is asserted, but notability looks like it will be difficult to show. -FrankTobia (talk) 05:41, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete it, as per nomination. RayAYang (talk) 06:07, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable and non-verifiable through multiple reliable 3rd party sources which cover the subject in a non-trivial manner. Jasynnash2 (talk) 09:04, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete The subject's notability is not well served by the article. There may be some WP:COI and WP:SPA concerns, too. Ecoleetage (talk) 12:38, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, actually should probably be a Speedy delete but I must say I actually laughed at the following: "References: Maine, Alex (2008), Alex Maine's Blog" Wow.  Just... wow. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:58, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. This article has been deleted 4 times and counting (created 7 minutes after its deletion the last time), and the editor still creates the article yet again. The last time this article was nominated, the editor even blanked the AFD page. The editor is clearly a spammer as the only edits by the account are creating this article over and over, so duly block him. LuciferMorgan (talk) 15:42, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per all of the above and salt. Sockpuppetry involved in article history, too. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:09, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete A7 - so nominated ukexpat (talk) 21:43, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.