Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Masucci


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 06:30, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Alex Masucci

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article fails to establish any kind of notability and is scarce in sources. I could not find any references outside Wikipedia.  Astros 4477  ( Talk ) 04:09, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  JAaron95  Talk  04:15, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  JAaron95  Talk  04:15, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  JAaron95  Talk  04:15, 18 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. The article as of now does not establish notability, and is written in a too low quality. Article can easily be restructured given it's size (Of-course when notability guidelines are met).. So, delete..-- JAaron95 Talk  04:19, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment this used to be much bigger with references, look in the history. However it looks as if the content was counted as dubious, and someone who looks to be the subject of this removed most of the content claiming "This is completely a lie, was written by malicious family".  So if indeed most of the content was wrong/misleading then this should get the chop. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:02, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I'd say, looking at the history, the subject still doesn't meet notability guidelines. Most of the sources pointed to YouTube and I'm not sure those would suffice for the subject's notability. Even looking at the *previous* version, still delete.. Regards-- JAaron95 Talk  05:32, 18 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete, possibly G11 - The lack of sources is not the only issue here; even the approved version has issues with promotional/glowing tone, which begs the question of whether the reviewer actually read the draft. (No offense intended to the reviewer.) — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 20:57, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - there is the LA Times, and there seem to be some print sources listed in this edit (though not with enough details to look them up). Masucci might well be notable, but the article would have to be rewritten almost entirely, with no unproblematic version to revert to. WP:TNT may apply. Huon (talk) 22:52, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - the most recent edits have done nothing ti improve things.  Velella  Velella Talk 13:41, 21 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.