Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex McKinnon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Doc ask?  15:33, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Alex McKinnon
Searching for '"alex mckinnon" agincourt' comes up with 4 results. 2 of them are this article, 2 aren't about him. This looks like a hoax to me. Cherry blossom tree 15:14, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-verified; either a hoax or someone's delusions of grandeur.   Buck  e  ts  ofg ✐ 15:19, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I think this is actually supposed to be a joke, i.e. "Proceeds are given to the needy, preferably someone blind." Delete either way. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:26, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom.    Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  15:36, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. He may actually exist (see the last paragraph), but I don't think freewebs counts as a reliable source. Any way seems to not reach WP:BIO no mater the notable pedigree. Clams to notability are, 1. The founder of an international society that can not be verified for its existence or notability. 2. The inventor of a economic principle which also can not be verified for its existence or notability, and is the basis of a book that is not named and may not exist (unpublished?).-- blue  520  15:54, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't see anything glaringly notable. Bige1977 16:51, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- ReyBrujo 07:38, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing notable and certainly some parts that seem like either a prank or vanity entry (or, both). Ted 15:18, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per non and Bucketsofg. -- so U  m  y  a  S  ch  15:19, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Nom. --Holy Cows 22:02, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 * KEEP. I know Alex McKinnon personally and I can testify that the Agincourt Society not only exists but is holding its next formal dinner at Raffles, Singapore later this month. Mr McKinnon's personal details are all correct. As for doubts raised in relation to charitable donations, the author should be ashamed of himself. Rt Hon Duncan Elliott — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elliott77 (talk • contribs)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.