Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Nackman (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 12:38, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Alex Nackman
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I'm just not seeing sufficient notability for this singer songwriter. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 20:15, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The last AfD was closed as keep, but reading through the keep !votes I can't see anything grounded in guidelines, just "seems notable enough" etc Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 20:17, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - Unsourced BLP. Carrite (talk) 22:41, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep: There was a solid KEEP in the 1st nomination and this should not be nominated again! Don't waste out time. - Ret.Prof (talk) 03:39, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete Touring lacks coverage. Albums self released. Nackman lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. It may have met wp:music in 2006 but things have changed since then. duffbeerforme (talk) 05:21, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. I can't find any substantial independent coverage of this artist. Just show schedules, and a passing reference in this New York Times article. If some reliable references can be found I will reconsider. Pburka (talk) 13:27, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - can't find significant coverage of this person by independent reliable sources. All we have right now are database entries, which are enough to verify existence but not establish notability, and a passing mention in the NYT, which is not significant coverage.--70.80.234.196 (talk) 14:59, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.