Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Nesic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Cirt (talk) 19:17, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Alex Nesic

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

fails WP:ENT. no significant roles or recognition. most of the third party coverage is passing mentions. . LibStar (talk) 02:50, 30 November 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:16, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per search showing meeting WP:ENT and WP:GNG . I'd call positive reception for his starring role in Sleeper Cell as significant. Lacking proper inline citations is a surmountable problem that calls for cleanup and not deletion.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 21:43, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - just squeeks by the requirements of WP:ENT in that he has had significant roles in multiple films/television series, most specifically "Sleeper cell" where he played a significant and well covered role in the Grammy nominated series. --Jezebel's Ponyo shhh 22:01, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:17, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. Appears to satisfy the requirements of WP:ENT, though not by too much. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:40, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.