Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Rafalowicz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was The result of this debate was Keep (8/3). May the Force be with you! Shreshth91 ($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|)  15:10, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

Alex Rafalowicz
The page is a vanity page. I will declares my bias and say I know the guy in question however it is still a vanity page for a non-notable individual AdelaideRandel 05:04, 4 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete As per nomination.WP:AUTO AdelaideRandel 05:04, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. In movie databases (IMDb, NYT, etc.)
 * oops - forgot to sign (original vote was --> 05:22, 4 November 2005 ERcheck) ERcheck 12:27, 4 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete although Shine (film) performance significant, does not pass WP:BIO... and the rest is vanity jnothman talk 06:38, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup. He played David Helfgott as a child in Shine a very notable Australian film. Geoffrey Rush won an Oscar as best actor for his portrayal of the adult David Helfgott. This role in itself makes him notable enough for mine. Article needa a bit of a clean up Capitalistroadster 16:53, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.  . Capitalistroadster 17:02, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. As I said on the talk page it is fairly evident from  Google search that this guy is notable however the page is as if it was written by the subject themselves.  Even so, that's a cleanup issue not a deletion issue. -- Francs2000 [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px|  ]] 18:50, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. As I said on the talk page it is fairly evident from  Google search that this guy is notable however the page is as if it was written by the subject themselves.  Even so, that's a cleanup issue not a deletion issue. -- Francs2000 [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px|  ]] 18:50, 4 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Does not (yet) meet any of the criteria in WP:BIO. pfctdayelise 02:17, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Capitalistroadster and Francs2000 (shouldn't that be Euros300 now?) Tonywalton | Talk 12:26, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * comment. No Matter if it receives hits in Google, the individual has a single relatively minor role in one movie. And it does not meet the guidelines in WP:BIO. AdelaideRandel 15:16, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Has appeared in at least two Australian feature films, one of which won Academy Awards. --Cnwb 07:26, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Cnwb. -- Ian &equiv; talk 02:00, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, although only just. Disclaimer: I do know the subject of the article, but not personally.--Cyberjunkie | Talk 13:11, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Snottygobble | Talk 06:16, 9 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.