Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Tsakiris


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 00:13, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Alex Tsakiris

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails our WP:BIO notability rules especially those governing WP:AUTHOR. Being referenced by others is not enough to confer notability. In order to be notable, you must actually be the subject of a serious reference work. Appearing on Coast to Coast is also not a signal of notability (lots of non-notable people are guests on that show). Furthermore, he is not notable for his book which would not pass WP:BK in any case. jps (talk) 13:52, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - this subject does not seeem to have had any significant mainstream coverage. I don't think a bunch of guest appearances on fringe media add up to any significant notability. --Salimfadhley (talk) 14:19, 5 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 15:12, 5 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete for now perhaps as although Books, Highbeam and browsers all found several links, I would suggest drafting and userfying until better is available. SwisterTwister   talk  08:12, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails GNG. Sources on article have originating place hidden, and they don't add up to anything real. Can't see him ever meeting it without a big change. Didn't find reliable sources for book or blog which would have earned one of them an article instead. {Please note it's Skeptiko, not Skeptico, podcast. Two podcasts with similar names but a completely different outlook. That's got to be a mess.) DreamGuy (talk) 15:20, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:09, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:38, 7 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete fails to meet the notability criteria for fringe theorists.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:51, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Individual fails WP:AUTHOR, the book fails WP:BK, and the podcast fails WP:WEB. His few passing mentions in reliable sources don't warrant a standalone article, though he may qualify for inclusion in a list article, although I don't know which one. - LuckyLouie (talk) 04:11, 11 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.