Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex White (second nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. I also protected the page from re-creation since this was the fourth time it had to be deleted. Angr/ talk 13:27, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Footnote: I removed the deletedpage tag, as there are valid incoming links to Alex White (for a British musician). I don't predict recreation of deleted content will be a major problem, but I'll keep an eye on it for a while just in case. — sjorford (talk)  17:03, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Alex White
not notable / unremarkable person. Nominated by User:Theusualsuspect. (2nd Nom, result of first was speedy delete) Sarah Ewart (Talk) 06:11, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn--Vercalos 06:18, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable--A Y  Arktos 06:27, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete student politician and former political staffer. May well be notable according to WP:BIO one day but not yet. Capitalistroadster 06:35, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of list of Australia-related deletions. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 06:30, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: probable vanity --djrobgordon 08:25, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: I wrote this article, but if student politicians are not be included generally, that's fine Presumably this includes Scott Crawford and Julian Barendse. DarrenRay 08:32, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Yep. Both have been AFD listed. --kingboyk 02:20, 9 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete: Not noteable student politician Kyle sb 09:46, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. -- Alpha269 16:36, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - student union advertising of a nobody.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 04:42, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. nn. Garglebutt / (talk) 05:46, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 05:47, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete thoroughly nn. --kingboyk 02:19, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: uncontroversial deletions like this one are good candidates for the Proposed deletion process currently being tested out. Consider using that simpler process for the next similar nomination. -- King of Hearts | (talk) 00:19, 10 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.