Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Dennis Enviro350H


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Redirecting may be further discussed on article's talk page. Regards,   A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 00:53, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Alexander Dennis Enviro350H

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No evidence of WP:notability. Single reference to it given after a previous speedy and two prod nominations. Google searches on article title show nothing significant. noq (talk) 00:49, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 7 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep or redirect to an appropriate target In any case, outright deletion is out of the question. I'm not sure it makes much sense to discuss the notability of a specific model of city bus but the company clearly is notable and that alone justifies keeping at least a redirect. Additionally we have coverage of that model and its launch in industry publications  and coverage of a sale . I'm not really sure how much more we can expect for a bus. Pichpich (talk) 01:32, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. As a specific marque-and-model of automotive vehicle, it is as close to inherently notable as things come. The aircraft project has a long-established (and codified, iirc) policy that any individual model of aircraft that can be verified through reliable sources as being a distinct model is notable, and there is no reason why the same logic should not be applied to models of motor vehicle, be they car, truck, Big Mack, or bus. - The Bushranger One ping only 19:42, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Wifione  Message 04:40, 14 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep as per the above, given that this is verifiable and sourced. Failing that, a redirect to the manufacturer might make sense - and I'm surprised that wasn't raised as an option before the debate. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 16:32, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.