Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Evgenievich Udodov


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 02:29, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Alexander Evgenievich Udodov

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The page does not meet the notability criteria for biographies. The page does not provide sufficient coverage from independent, reliable sources that address his life and career in depth. Many of the references seem to be related to business transactions or deals, rather than addressing Udodov himself and his significance. This could potentially violate Wikipedia's notability policy (WP:N). The article appears to lack neutral point of view (NPOV) with promotional tone in sections such as "Import substitution" and "Donations" which may violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. LusikSnusik (talk) 09:13, 28 July 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,Rosguill talk 02:34, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. LusikSnusik (talk) 09:13, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NOTLINKEDIN. If sufficient sources are found still needs WP:TNT. &mdash;siro&chi;o 09:39, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:45, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep on good faith - This appears to be a literal translation from Wikipedia Russia and Wikipedia Egyptian Arabic. — Maile  (talk) 16:56, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. That person might be notable to some degree as a subject of investigation by Navalny and international sanctions, but otherwise does not seem very notable - based on sources currently provided on the page. My very best wishes (talk) 22:39, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

— the Main Logan  (t•c) 09:02, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: nomination + the article is poorly written regardless


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.