Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Ikonnikov


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  03:32, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Alexander Ikonnikov

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No hint of person's significance. Huge problems with WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Poor or no reliable sources Bash7oven (talk) 21:13, 8 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  00:05, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Russia. Shellwood (talk) 21:28, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. You have nominated several articles by a statement for all the nominations! If you check out the article and the sources on Google, you will easily understand he is notable! —Natalie Ricci Natalie 01:03, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. The subject's a typical administator in business ("supervisory board", "Independent Directors Association", "member of the Board of Directors of several Russian and international companies", etc). His sole serious claim to notability appears to be some Wall Street Journal "profile" but the url leads nowhere. From then on, all we have are appearances in listings and directories, of which one would have at least have expected more, even though they do not by themselves offer proof of notability. There is truly nothing on which to hang a significant notion of notability. And the fact that the article was created by a single-purpose account does not help. -The Gnome (talk) 17:29, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete, I don't see any claims to notability in the article CT55555 (talk) 02:05, 16 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.