Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Karnal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The SandDoctor Talk 07:14, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Alexander Karnal

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Let's review the sources:


 * database entry,
 * all the information is about Deerfield, not Karnal
 * mere mention
 * mere mention
 * mere mention
 * mere mention
 * Softball Q&A with an alma mater PR outlet, not reliable or particularly independent
 * Company website
 * not independent
 * quotes the subject once
 * 20 under 40 list by an industry publication signed,Rosguill talk 02:20, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 02:20, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 02:20, 10 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Sources do not show notability and/or are not secondary sources. A search of Google, JSTOR and ProQuest did not produce additional sources, and NYT's articles discussed Karnal in passing (in regards to his wedding). Z1720 (talk) 03:04, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment Analysis of sources is spot on, although I'm waiting for a bit before deciding incase sources show up.Hmanburg (talk) 09:43, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete — Subject of article is a business person who doesn’t possess sufficient coverage in reliable sources independent of them to warrant a standalone article. Celestina007 (talk) 09:50, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - While accomplished, does not pass WP:GNG. Onel 5969  TT me 12:35, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete not even close to enough sourcing to show notability for a businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:19, 12 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.