Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Palhoto


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Clear consensus for deletion. North America1000 01:19, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Alexander Palhoto

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by the article's creator without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:32, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:32, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   20:38, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   20:38, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   20:39, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   20:40, 12 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete I was unable to find any WP:GNG or WP:BIO passing coverage of the subject. Winner 42 Talk to me!  01:23, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 06:53, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 11:15, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. Article seems to be a clear case of WP:TOOSOON as the subject is only 16, the article can easily be recreated if and when the subject meets the aforementioned requirements. Inter&#38;anthro (talk) 16:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Article makes no indication of signature coverage in reliable sources, and I was unable to independently find any through online sources. Jogurney (talk) 20:36, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I fail to find anything to verify a biograpic entry with. /Julle (talk) 13:54, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete The article's subject does not appear to be notable enough for there to be a substantial amount of English language sources. Firstclass306 (talk) 23:06, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 * This isn't necessarily a problem. We don't require sources to be in English – no encyclopedia writing about the entire world can rely on one language to get the information it needs. We merely prefer English sources over non-English sources when they're of equal quality and relevance. Worse, though, is that there doesn't seem to be any substantial amount of sources in any other language either. /Julle (talk) 23:14, 18 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.