Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Plank

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Speedy deleted. Hedley 3 July 2005 03:19 (UTC)

Alexander
Delete non-notable vanity. Google returns a single relevant hit, which looks like his own site. -Splash 23:50, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * It should probably be noted that Alex is also a Wikipedia user (or used to be), with various names as he kept doing various stupid things and then tried to come back pretending to be someone else. Adam Bishop 23:51, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep It is not a vanity page. Plank did not make it. I did, and I am not Alex. Try searching for "Alex", and you should get more results. He usually goes by "Alex", so that should work. --MichTheWeird 23:55, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete: non notable, vanity --Ragib 23:58, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I did the google search, very few relavent hits even with "Alex" out of about only 270 or so. Either way, non-notable. Sasquatch&#08242;&#08596;Talk&#08596;Contributions 23:59, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nobody in particular. Wile E. Heresiarch 00:03, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC) Speed deleted. See note below. Wile E. Heresiarch 03:58, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn vanity. --Etacar11 00:16, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Do any of you voting "delete" even know what Alex's IP is? It is different from mine. I'm guessing you're probably just supporting him, right? --MichTheWeird 00:19, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * I don't care if you're Alex or the Queen of England. This should be Speedied as an attack page, and if a genuine article about were to be written, I would vote to delete on grounds of non-notability. A &#1080; D &#1103; 01D  TALK  EMAIL  01:19, Jun 27, 2005 (UTC)
 * Umm... did you not read my comments? I never asserted you were him... I based my vote upon non-notability... Frankly, I've never heard of him and google doesn't know much of him either. That justifies deletion now you should read up on some policy before you make any further pages/edits. Sasquatch&#08242;&#08596;Talk&#08596;Contributions 03:14, Jun 27, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. nn vanity. As other comments above, my vote is regardless of who the article's creator is and is instead vote on article itself. Whitehorse1 03:20, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete &mdash; I think the image and comments were put there by some horse's ass. The remainder of the page looks okay. But I don't think he's prominent enough to warrant a page, at least not yet. Sorry. &mdash; RJH 03:27, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - it's a stealthy attack page, check out the picture. humblefool&reg; 03:30, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Speed deleted as an attack page. The image in question: Wile E. Heresiarch 03:57, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.