Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Rosenblatt (musicologist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:49, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Alexander Rosenblatt (musicologist)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Setting aside what appears to be some fishy COI editing from the page's creator, the subject fails WP:NACADEMIC. agt x 22:58, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Israel. Shellwood (talk) 23:02, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Zero sources found in GScholar or Jstor, he might be an academic but isn't notable as one. Appears to be a Russian pianist with the same name, they have a few hits. Oaktree b (talk) 23:59, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nominator. —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 04:13, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment. As editor-in-chief of a journal (Min Ad) that has been active since 1999, there is a possible case for WP:NPROF C8. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 06:47, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment – 'Min-Ad' is not listed by Scopus, so I could not obtain a SCImago score, but it does not seem to be a particularly notable publication, not sufficient to meet WP:NPROF C8 in my view. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 16:37, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Creator has been blocked for socking. >>> Extorc . talk  16:58, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, Per nom., not enough coverage to meet notability. Alex-h (talk) 16:28, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. In my search, insufficient coverage for the WP:GNG for this Israeli musician and musicologist. The Russian composer easily passes this bar. gidonb (talk) 16:32, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment. Good call by nominator to focus on the stuff that matters. COI can be fixed. But when the BLP fails the GNG there is no reason to do so. In the end it's all about notability. gidonb (talk) 02:01, 10 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.