Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Schnell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Salvio giuliano 20:25, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Alexander Schnell

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG, and with low citation counts and an h-Index of 6, does not meet WP:NSCHOLAR. Was also tagged for COI by.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:25, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:25, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Philosophy and Germany.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:27, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * keep passes WP:NAUTHOR given that he wrote books that have multiple reviews which I found in a couple of minutes:    . However the article needs some cleanup and should not read like a CV. --hroest 15:15, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep if we we add the books' reviews - it would then pass WP:AUTHOR as mentioned above!
 * JamesKH76 (talk) 16:47, 8 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep - per Hannes Röst. I'd like to maybe see some translations of the titles of his various works and I'd like to see some sources added to his biography.KatoKungLee (talk) 17:32, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 23:40, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep, as there are other sources easily found. The one university source relied on here is significant coverage but not altogether independent. Moonraker (talk) 23:28, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. The degree of coverage indicates that the subject meets WP:NOTABILITY thresholds specified in WP:GNG, WP:NSCHOLAR, and WP:NAUTHOR. Deletion could be considered if the subject wasn’t notable, however, as I have detailed above the subject has demonstrable notability. Shawn Teller (talk) 02:54, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Comments. Unless someone adds the appropriate cites, this does not meet WP:HEY as I understand. Willing to change my mind. Bearian (talk) 16:07, 15 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.