Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Stoll (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:22, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Alexander Stoll
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:NACADEMIC, the subject of the article hasn't had a notable impact on research, received a major honor, or been appointed or elected to any prestigious post (as far as I can tell). Per WP:GNG, there are no independent sources discussing this person, apart from trivial mentions in passing, where they are not the subject of the news article. DferDaisy (talk) 02:48, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 05:45, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 05:45, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Every morning   (there's a halo...)  22:27, 4 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. I can't find anything that would indicate a pass of WP:PROF either, and no media coverage to speak of. But I'm surprised to see that this was (re)created by an experienced content creator. Is there something we're missing? –&#8239;Joe (talk) 23:08, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment The claim by that there is "no media coverage to speak of" is simply false: there are some reliable media sources discussing Stoll's role in the founding of Arrogen Veterinary Forensics, a forensic science lab dedicated to fighting crimes committed against animals last year.    The founding of this lab  was also reported in the peer-reviewed journal the Veterinary Record, in which Stoll is also mentioned by name.  I am neutral on whether this article should be kept, however.  Every morning   (there's a halo...)  02:52, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
 * But that's coverage of the company (which I think definitely is notable), not Stoll. He's barely mentioned. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 09:50, 6 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete clear failure of academic notability guidelines. On the issue of the company he works for, it takes a little bit because of the wording, but he is not even the head of the company.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:32, 6 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.