Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander randall 5th


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete without prejudice against a sourced, NPOV rewrite by somebody independent of the article subject. GRBerry 03:04, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Alexander randall 5th

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Weak Delete The subject does not seem to be particularly notable under WP:BIO, the article lacks citations, and it may have been written by the subject. If it can be improved, with notability shown, I would not be averse to inclusion. (note: I originally added a db-bio tag, which seemed appropriate, however, a google search showed that the subject was potentially notable, so I have changed it to this afd nom.) Grand Slam 7 | Talk 21:38, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is a tough one, as it asserts WP:Notability. I don't know enough about his work to comment on the content, but the article violates the autobiography, professorial notability, reliable sources, and neutral point of view rules.  Bearian 00:49, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep- massive revamp needed though, marginally keepable.JJJ999 00:23, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, the article violates far too many policies to name.  Bur nt sau ce  17:47, 28 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.