Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexandra Ares (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 16:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Alexandra Ares
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:CREATIVE. Autobiography/resume of U.N. employee who operates non-notable website. The website has no Alexa ranking due to insufficient data. Her books are self-published and not notable, and awards recorded in article are vanity awards. What isn't original research is sourced to her website. AfD failed in 2009 based on alleged chapter about her in non-notable "Romanian encyclopedia," but the link provided does not mention her, and only mention ofto her on the site is an item on a vanity award. Link to alleged Romanian writers directory redirects to Chinese site. Figureofnine (talk • contribs) 16:06, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:51, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:51, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:51, 24 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 14:55, 1 June 2014 (UTC)




 * Delete I am inclined to agree that she and her work are non-notable and what little evidence does exist links to vanity publishing. Longwayround (talk) 18:17, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - I don't see enough coverage for notability. --Jakob (talk) (my editor review) 22:30, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete This seems to be a case where an assumption of notability was run by people who claimed to know what was going on against most people who did not understand the sources. No clear indication of notability was show, we should remove the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:16, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep I think the amount of publishing and public activities establishes her notability.--Codrin.B (talk) 11:57, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Could you please cite some reliable sources for her notability? I have yet to find any. Longwayround (talk) 11:33, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.