Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexandra Bogojevic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 13:31, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Alexandra Bogojevic

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

"Multiple roles" my ass. What notability is there in appearing in bit parts in 4 movies 40 years ago? With the only "source" being an unknown book. Trillfendi (talk) 15:24, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 15:31, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 15:31, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 15:31, 24 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep Notability is not about the content of the article (WP:CONTN), but about the subject. The German Wikipedia article lists 34 films, 23 of which have articles on German Wikipedia. She starred in 4 and had significant roles in 6, so she certainly meets WP:NACTOR. The German WP article also gives an alternate form of her name, Sascha Bogojevic, which brings up more Google results. Access to German language sources for the 1970s and 80s would no doubt give more sources. (The book which is currently the sole reference is not unknown - it's on Google Books, for one thing. It appears to only include one of her films, so is not a great reference, but it's certainly not unknown.) RebeccaGreen (talk) 16:21, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * And still all they offer is IMDb and "filmportal.de", neither of which are reliable sources. Trillfendi (talk) 16:37, 24 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep. A supporting role should not be dismissed as a "bit part". "40 years ago" doesn't matter – once notable, always notable. And the book cited as a reference is held by 124 libraries worldwide, according to Worldcat. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 16:32, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * A supporting role can be big or small, in this case clearly it's a smattering of unnotable "bit parts"–many of them uncredited. Not one of these. Really what's the point. Appearances doesn't = notability. Trillfendi (talk) 16:37, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * And the four starring roles? Hardly "bit parts". RebeccaGreen (talk) 17:09, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * "starring" without top billing in direct-to-video movies? Yeah ok. Trillfendi (talk) 20:44, 24 April 2019 (UTC)


 * + Three of the four films in the article including two prominent roles were cinema releases in Germany in the 1970s before video was invented Atlantic306 (talk) 16:27, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Touche Coolabahapple (talk) 11:22, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:24, 28 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep a simple check of the German language page for this person indicates that they are indeed notable and there is much room for expansion of the English language page. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 16:52, 28 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.