Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexandra Jamieson (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Super Size Me. I read the arguments to delete as "this topic is not notable"; nobody has argued against redirecting in principle. Vanamonde (Talk) 16:59, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Alexandra Jamieson
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No reliable sources about her (rather than written by her). The article is highly promotional. MarioGom (talk) 16:49, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and United States of America. MarioGom (talk) 16:49, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree redirect to her ex is not a desirable outcome, so delete and SALT to boot. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 17:21, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Authors, Women,  and Oregon.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:56, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Netherzone (talk) 22:16, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I turned all the embedded links into inline citations and marked places that need citations and or better sources. No reliable sources for notability that I can find. Page created from redirect from a single topic editor who has made a total of 3 edits. I also requested deletion of copyrighted images from Commons. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:06, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - I originally redirected as an ATD, but clearly this individual has no notability. Most likely a COI/UPE piece. Onel 5969  TT me 01:39, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Super Size Me per WP:ATD. She is major part of this film; and its the achievement that she is most associated with.4meter4 (talk) 15:18, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the film Super Size Me is a viable option to deletion as noted above by . She does not meet notability criteria on her own per WP:NARTIST or WP:GNG, however the film is notable and she had a major role in it. Netherzone (talk) 16:00, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment I don't recall her role in the film Super Size Me, but participants in the previous AfD asserted her role was confined to less than 10 minutes of the overall film? That's not 'major', IMHO... Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 16:06, 16 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.